<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for realismblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realismblog.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realismblog.com</link>
	<description>realismblog is devoted to issues of representation and realism in the fine arts and painting in particular</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Tribute to Paul Havas, 1941–2012 by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=425&#038;cpage=1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realismblog.com/?p=425#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mike - 

Paul often talked about his older brother Ed. I think that Ed was a very big influence on Paul, both in terms of example and philosophy.

- Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike &#8211; </p>
<p>Paul often talked about his older brother Ed. I think that Ed was a very big influence on Paul, both in terms of example and philosophy.</p>
<p>- Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Tribute to Paul Havas, 1941–2012 by Mike Havas</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=425&#038;cpage=1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Havas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realismblog.com/?p=425#comment-80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your kind words and insight on my uncle Paul.  A great guy and my Godfather.  Always remembered me on my birthdays in the 60s.  We talked often over the past 15 years.

He was a unique artist as is my dad, his brother 
Ed.

A live well lived leaves remembrance and a legacy.  This was Pauls art.

Cheers.

Mike Havas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your kind words and insight on my uncle Paul.  A great guy and my Godfather.  Always remembered me on my birthdays in the 60s.  We talked often over the past 15 years.</p>
<p>He was a unique artist as is my dad, his brother<br />
Ed.</p>
<p>A live well lived leaves remembrance and a legacy.  This was Pauls art.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
<p>Mike Havas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paul Havas: New Landscapes by Paul Havas</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=10&#038;cpage=1#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Havas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elston.net/realismblog/?p=10#comment-79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this tribute to Paul&#039;s work.  Margaret Miller Havas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this tribute to Paul&#8217;s work.  Margaret Miller Havas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technique Sufficient To Expression by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=266&#038;cpage=1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 02:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realismblog.com/?p=266#comment-51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This comment was sent to me by William Dubin, with the request that I post it as a reply:

&quot;I think you summed up the whole thing really well, plus the Creek 1 painting by Ramesh is one I really like, wish you had shown it to me when you first showed me the other 2.

&quot;I was thinking of Henri yesterday... a statement he made in regards to a student asking if they had gotten the proportions correct in a life drawing they were doing. He replied something like &#039;...getting the proportions correctly isn&#039;t nearly as important as getting the feeling correct,&#039; (sorry I don&#039;t have the exact quote.) I think this goes along neatly with the statement of Henri&#039;s that you reference.

&quot;Clearly, judging from Ramesh&#039;s comment, he was lucky enough to have a teacher who put him on the right path early on. This is exactly what I was talking about, and exactly what&#039;s missing today.

&quot;Reardon is just an example: It&#039;s not actually fair to label him any more than the vast majority of watercolor painters you see today. The magazine WATERCOLOR, which had the article on Reardon, tends to champion this sort of work. The same issue features a woman who does fantastic  paintings featuring fine crystal, bowls, goblets, etc., all planned out as if in a war campaign, masked out and layered. She must go through a gallon of masking fluid on each one. The result is fantastic, but one that has no &#039;heart&#039;, to use Ramesh&#039;s term. It&#039;s pure intellect, and you might as well do it on a computer. Why bother with the paint, it doesn&#039;t add anything.

&quot;Re. Ramesh&#039;s comment: Forget your &#039;head&#039;, it will just lie to you. One author referred to this as &#039;roof-brain chatter&#039;. Do everything in your power to let the brush and the medium work out the painting, your hand and your eye &#039;know&#039; what to do, it&#039;s your head that gets in the way. I rarely end up with what I started with. If the painting doesn&#039;t take it&#039;s own course, if it doesn&#039;t surprise me, if it just looks like the thing I started working from, then it&#039;s time to rip it up. Art should be magic.&quot;

Bill Dubin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment was sent to me by William Dubin, with the request that I post it as a reply:</p>
<p>&#8220;I think you summed up the whole thing really well, plus the Creek 1 painting by Ramesh is one I really like, wish you had shown it to me when you first showed me the other 2.</p>
<p>&#8220;I was thinking of Henri yesterday&#8230; a statement he made in regards to a student asking if they had gotten the proportions correct in a life drawing they were doing. He replied something like &#8216;&#8230;getting the proportions correctly isn&#8217;t nearly as important as getting the feeling correct,&#8217; (sorry I don&#8217;t have the exact quote.) I think this goes along neatly with the statement of Henri&#8217;s that you reference.</p>
<p>&#8220;Clearly, judging from Ramesh&#8217;s comment, he was lucky enough to have a teacher who put him on the right path early on. This is exactly what I was talking about, and exactly what&#8217;s missing today.</p>
<p>&#8220;Reardon is just an example: It&#8217;s not actually fair to label him any more than the vast majority of watercolor painters you see today. The magazine WATERCOLOR, which had the article on Reardon, tends to champion this sort of work. The same issue features a woman who does fantastic  paintings featuring fine crystal, bowls, goblets, etc., all planned out as if in a war campaign, masked out and layered. She must go through a gallon of masking fluid on each one. The result is fantastic, but one that has no &#8216;heart&#8217;, to use Ramesh&#8217;s term. It&#8217;s pure intellect, and you might as well do it on a computer. Why bother with the paint, it doesn&#8217;t add anything.</p>
<p>&#8220;Re. Ramesh&#8217;s comment: Forget your &#8216;head&#8217;, it will just lie to you. One author referred to this as &#8216;roof-brain chatter&#8217;. Do everything in your power to let the brush and the medium work out the painting, your hand and your eye &#8216;know&#8217; what to do, it&#8217;s your head that gets in the way. I rarely end up with what I started with. If the painting doesn&#8217;t take it&#8217;s own course, if it doesn&#8217;t surprise me, if it just looks like the thing I started working from, then it&#8217;s time to rip it up. Art should be magic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bill Dubin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technique Sufficient To Expression by Ramesh Jhawar</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=266&#038;cpage=1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramesh Jhawar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 05:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realismblog.com/?p=266#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear William,
Thank you for referring my works here in the context of usage of techniques for expression.
I remember my teacher&#039;s saying that paint for joy and not to sell. Today most of the artists (including myself)have pressure to sell their work and so they become &#039;methodical&#039; and take calculated risks as Mr.Dubin puts it. But wonderful paintings are created when one paints with heart and not the mind. Sometimes before beginning, I play the brush strokes and the plan over and over in my mind until my head starts spinning and I then wonder it is best to let the brush and the medium play themselves. You may not get 100% of what you visualised in your mind  but get a better painting nevertheless! That is the joy of painting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear William,<br />
Thank you for referring my works here in the context of usage of techniques for expression.<br />
I remember my teacher&#8217;s saying that paint for joy and not to sell. Today most of the artists (including myself)have pressure to sell their work and so they become &#8216;methodical&#8217; and take calculated risks as Mr.Dubin puts it. But wonderful paintings are created when one paints with heart and not the mind. Sometimes before beginning, I play the brush strokes and the plan over and over in my mind until my head starts spinning and I then wonder it is best to let the brush and the medium play themselves. You may not get 100% of what you visualised in your mind  but get a better painting nevertheless! That is the joy of painting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Transformation 2.0, Part 2 (Better Luck Next Bardo) by Dominique Amendola</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominique Amendola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elston.net/realismblog/?p=70#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article! Very revealing to the figurative painter....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! Very revealing to the figurative painter&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Transformation 2.0, Part 2 (Better Luck Next Bardo) by Wm. Dubin</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Wm. Dubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elston.net/realismblog/?p=70#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill,

The new blog entry looks great.... really nice to see all the various paintings in one spot.

You and I have discussed what you&#039;ve written many times, so we both know each others opinions already and are in agreement on nearly all, so no need to comment further.

I&#039;m still blown out by how the new academy has conned the art world into believing it&#039;s still avant garde and &quot;liberal&quot; when it&#039;s really neither.... you would think some of these people would have woken up by now!

As we&#039;ve discussed before, I&#039;d like to see the visual part expand into many on-line galleries, perhaps sub-divided by the different catagories of realism that are going today, like an on-line museum exhibition.

Hope you get lots of attention paid to this......

Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>The new blog entry looks great&#8230;. really nice to see all the various paintings in one spot.</p>
<p>You and I have discussed what you&#8217;ve written many times, so we both know each others opinions already and are in agreement on nearly all, so no need to comment further.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still blown out by how the new academy has conned the art world into believing it&#8217;s still avant garde and &#8220;liberal&#8221; when it&#8217;s really neither&#8230;. you would think some of these people would have woken up by now!</p>
<p>As we&#8217;ve discussed before, I&#8217;d like to see the visual part expand into many on-line galleries, perhaps sub-divided by the different catagories of realism that are going today, like an on-line museum exhibition.</p>
<p>Hope you get lots of attention paid to this&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Nude, Denuded by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elston.net/realismblog/?p=62#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kurt - Yes this is one of my three blogs. Glad you found it, wanna write something? I&#039;ll give you author privileges if you do.

I&#039;m doing good otherwise. Sorry that I&#039;ll miss your NYC show, but won&#039;t be in city then. I&#039;m considering a mid-July trip, for a black belt clinic. Good luck with the show!!

-Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kurt &#8211; Yes this is one of my three blogs. Glad you found it, wanna write something? I&#8217;ll give you author privileges if you do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing good otherwise. Sorry that I&#8217;ll miss your NYC show, but won&#8217;t be in city then. I&#8217;m considering a mid-July trip, for a black belt clinic. Good luck with the show!!</p>
<p>-Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Nude, Denuded by Kurt Solmssen</title>
		<link>http://www.realismblog.com/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Solmssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elston.net/realismblog/?p=62#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Is this Bill Elston?  I am new to this blog.  I think any idiot can see that this is your site but just making sure.
  How are you?      Best,   Kurt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Is this Bill Elston?  I am new to this blog.  I think any idiot can see that this is your site but just making sure.<br />
  How are you?      Best,   Kurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
